How a vascular practice generated 80+ qualified leads at $10 CPL by owning the alternative-to-surgery position.
The vascular practice offered a non-surgical alternative to knee replacement but couldn't compete with orthopedic practices on 'knee pain' search ads. We built a Meta campaign targeting patients who had already been told they need knee replacement, with creative speaking directly to patients looking for an alternative. The campaign now generates consistent qualified consultation volume from a niche audience that paid search couldn't reach efficiently.
80+
Qualified Leads
In 30 days
$10
Cost Per Lead
9:1
Return on Investment
+Staff
Hired to Keep Up
Demand outpaced capacity
Snapshot
Client snapshot.
- Practice type
- Vascular practice, Texas, minimally invasive knee pain treatments
- Services
- Minimally invasive vascular procedures for chronic knee pain, non-surgical alternatives to knee replacement
- Patient profile
- Adults 50+, already evaluated for knee replacement, actively looking to avoid surgery
- Prior marketing
- Outspent by orthopedic groups on Google for broad 'knee pain' terms, low conversion
- Services used
- Meta Ads · Landing Pages · Lead Capture & CRM Integration
- Core problem
- Competing for the wrong patient at the wrong stage. The orthopedic budget war is unwinnable for a vascular practice.
- Engagement timeline
- 30 days to first wave of results · ongoing
The Problem
Orthopedic practices own 'knee pain.' A vascular practice that tries to compete on the same terms loses.
Orthopedic practices dominate the keyword 'knee pain' in paid search. They own 'knee pain relief,' 'knee pain specialist,' and almost every related term. Vascular practices that bid against them are competing against organizations with marketing budgets measured in tens of thousands per month, and most cannot sustain that fight.
But there is a patient population orthopedic advertising does not reach, does not speak to, and does not want: the person who has already been told they need a knee replacement and is looking for a reason not to have one. That patient is not searching for a knee pain specialist. They are searching for a way out of surgery, and most orthopedic ads are not built for them.
This Texas practice identified that gap and built a Meta Ads campaign specifically for it. The competitive advantage was not a bigger budget. It was a clearer position.
Audit
What the audit revealed about the addressable patient.
The right patient was already in the market, just not being spoken to by anyone.
Wrong channel for the patient
Google captures patients searching for a specific solution. The target patient did not know minimally invasive vascular treatment existed and would never search for it by name.
Generic positioning against giants
Running 'knee pain specialist' against orthopedic groups produced high CPCs and low conversion. The practice was paying premium prices to lose a search auction it was never going to win.
Message did not name the fear
Existing creative talked about the practice and the treatment. It did not address what the patient was actually feeling: fear of surgery, recovery, time off work, complications.
Landing page did not match the patient's question
Patients arriving from any ad landed on a general services page. There was no page that specifically answered the question 'is there an alternative to knee replacement?'
Strategy
Reach a patient orthopedic advertising leaves behind, with a message that names the fear.
Demand creation on Meta, not demand capture on Google. Demographic and behavioral targeting around adults 50+ in the service area, with creative built around the psychology of confronting surgery and looking for an alternative.
Position around surgery avoidance
Stop competing on 'knee pain.' Compete on 'non-surgical alternative to knee replacement.' Different patient, different decision point, no orthopedic budget pressure.
Creative that names the fear directly
Ad copy used the words patients actually use about not wanting surgery: anesthesia, recovery time, time off work. Named the fear, named the alternative.
Matched landing page
A page specifically about avoiding knee replacement, the minimally invasive procedure, and a straightforward consultation request. No friction between the ad message and the page.
Per-segment ad sets + A/B testing
Separate ad sets for arthritis discomfort, limited mobility, and surgery avoidance. Weekly optimization moved budget toward the top-performing combinations of creative and landing page.
Engagement Timeline
Week 0
Audit + positioning reframe
Week 1
Creative + landing page rebuilt around surgery avoidance
Week 2
Meta campaigns live with segmented ad sets
Week 3
A/B winners scaled, follow-up sequences live in CRM
Day 30
80+ leads at $10 CPL · 9:1 ROI · staff hired
Campaign Architecture
Why Meta, not Google, was the right channel for this patient.
Google captures demand that already exists. Meta creates demand or reaches people who have not yet expressed it by searching.
Demographic + behavioral targeting
Adults 50+ in the practice's service area, the population most likely to be facing a knee replacement recommendation. The psychology of the moment did the qualifying.
Messaging-as-targeting
The creative did the filtering work. A patient scrolling past 'non-surgical knee pain relief, no replacement required' is not the right patient. The one who stops is.
Three ad sets, three patient situations
Arthritis discomfort, limited mobility, surgery avoidance. Same offer, three different on-ramps that matched whichever framing the patient self-identified with.
Immediate CRM follow-up
Lead form submissions triggered automated follow-up sequences within minutes, then a human call. Speed-to-contact protected the impulse the ad created.
Results
Results at 30 days.
80+
Qualified leads
First 30 days
$10
Cost per lead
Avg across the campaign
9:1
Return on investment
+Staff
Hired to handle intake
Demand outpaced existing capacity
Key Takeaways
What this case shows about vascular practice marketing.
Positioning beats budget
A vascular practice cannot outspend an orthopedic group on 'knee pain.' It can absolutely outposition them on 'alternative to knee replacement.' The patient is different, the decision point is different, and the competitive pressure is almost zero.
Meta works for demand creation, not just awareness
Patients who don't know your solution exists won't find you on Google. Meta reached them by demographic and behavioral profile and introduced a solution they didn't know to look for.
Messaging does the targeting work
'Non-surgical knee pain relief, no replacement required' filters for the right patient on its own. The creative does what platform interest targeting used to do before healthcare advertising restrictions narrowed the options.
Demand can outpace capacity faster than expected
When the message matches an underserved patient population, results don't trickle. The practice hired additional staff in the first month because intake volume exceeded what existing schedulers could handle.
Get Started
Stuck competing on the same terms as a much larger specialty?
We'll identify the patient population your bigger competitors are leaving behind and build a campaign that owns that position, not the auction.
Continue exploring
Related work and reading.
Case Studies
More client outcomes
How a multi-location plastic surgery group increased qualified consultations by 510% in six months.
The four-location plastic surgery group was spending $28K/month on Google and Meta Ads with flat consultation volume — the budget wasn't the problem, the system was. We rebuilt campaigns at the procedure level, built four procedure-specific landing pages, and connected tracking to actual booked consultations. Qualified surgical consultations grew 510% in six months at the same ad budget.
How a 14-provider orthopedic group built 120+ monthly consultations and fully absorbed 3 new providers in 8 months.
The practice was adding surgeons faster than referrals could consistently fill schedules. We implemented SEO, Google Ads, landing pages, and conversion tracking tied to booked consultations. Within 8 months, the practice was consistently generating enough patient demand to support the expanded provider team.
How an 11-location med spa group sustained a 3.1× return on ad spend and grew booked consultations by 62%.
The 11-location med spa group had inconsistent results across markets, with each location running different programs and no portfolio-wide standard. We rebuilt the creative with a compliance-first approach, shifted to conversion-objective campaigns, and built treatment-specific landing pages for each market. The group now sustains 3.1x ROAS across all 11 locations with consistent booked-consultation volume.